The best super replica Audemars Piguet (AP) watches From China At 2025-Xwatches.ws

As of 2025, the best super replica Audemars Piguet (AP) watches come from a select group of elite manufacturers in China, each specializing in different AP models (Royal Oak, Offshore, Concept, etc.). Here’s the definitive ranking based on movement accuracy, case finishing, and dial/clasp details:

Top 3 AP Super Clone Manufacturers (2025)

1. APS Factory (Formerly “XF” + “ZF” Collaboration) – Best Overall Royal Oak 15202/15500/15510

  • Why? APS merged the best of XF (case shape) and ZF (dial quality) to create the most gen-like Royal Oak reps.
  • Key Features:
    • Perfect “Petite Tapisserie” dial texture (closest to gen)
    • Thinnest case profile (mimics gen AP’s ultra-thin design)
    • Updated 4302/7121 clone movements (improved reliability over Miyota)
  • Best Models:
    • 15202 “Jumbo” Extra-Thin (best blue dial replica)
    • 15510 (newest Royal Oak with brushed bezel)

[ Shop Now ]

2. ZF Factory – Best Royal Oak Offshore (Diver, Chrono, etc.)

  • Why? ZF dominates the Offshore series with superior weight, bezel screws, and rubber strap quality.
  • Key Features:
    • Best case engraving & screw alignment (critical for APs)
    • Correct “Mega Tapisserie” dials (bold texture like gen)
    • A4302 chrono movement (for Offshore Chronos)
  • Best Models:
    • 15710 Diver (most balanced rep)
    • 26401RO “Black Panther” (ceramic case perfection)

[ Shop Now ]

3. BF Factory (Buff/VSF) – Best AP “Frosted Gold” & Rare Models

  • Why? BF focuses on high-end finishes (e.g., frosted gold, ceramic, openworked dials).
  • Key Features:
    • Gen-spec “Frosted Gold” finishing (identical to AP’s hammered texture)
    • Buff-made skeletonized dials (for Concept models)
  • Best Models:
    • 15454OR “Frosted Gold” (ultra-luxury look)
    • 26585CE “Ceramic Perpetual Calendar” (niche but flawless)

[ Shop Now ]

Which AP Replica Should You Buy?

  • Royal Oak (15202/15500) → APS Factory (thinnest, best dial)
  • Royal Oak Offshore → ZF Factory (best durability & details)
  • Limited Editions (Frosted Gold, Ceramic) → BF Factory

At XWatches.ws, we source directly from these factories to ensure 1:1 quality. Ask us for the latest 2025 AP super clones with video QC!

Need a specific AP model recommendation? Let me know (e.g., “Blue 15202,” “Black Ceramic Offshore,” etc.).

Top 3 Daytona Super Clone Manufacturers (2025)-xwatches.ws

As of 2025, the best super replica Rolex Daytona watches come from a few top-tier manufacturers in China, known for their 1:1 quality, reliable movements, and near-perfect details. Here are the leading factories producing the most accurate Daytona replicas:

Top 3 Daytona Super Clone Manufacturers (2025)

1. Clean Factory (CF) – Best Overall Daytona

  • Why? Clean Factory remains the #1 choice for Daytona replicas, especially their 4130 clone movement versions.
  • Key Features:
    • Gen-spec 904L stainless steel
    • 1:1 weight & dimensions
    • Best dial & bezel engraving (closest to genuine)
    • Reliable 4130 movement (fully functional chronograph, 72h power reserve)
  • Best Model: Clean Daytona 116500 (Panda & Black Dial)

[ Shop Now ]

2. BT Factory (Buff/VSF Collaboration) – Best Dial & Finishing

  • Why? BT Factory (Buff/VSF) focuses on ultra-high-end finishing, especially on the dial and case.
  • Key Features:
    • Buff-made dials (considered the best in the rep game)
    • VSF-level case polishing (smoother edges than Clean)
    • Same 4130 movement as Clean (but slightly more expensive)
  • Best Model: BT Daytona 116519LN (Oysterflex Meteorite Dial)

[ Shop Now]

3. Noob Factory (If Still Available) – Legendary Status

  • Why? Noob was the OG Daytona super clone maker, but after multiple raids, their supply is limited.
  • Key Features:
    • Original 4130 clone movement (first to perfect it)
    • Slightly better case shape than Clean (some collectors prefer Noob’s proportions)
  • Best Model: Noob Daytona 116508 (Green Gold) – If you can find one!

[ Shop Now ]

Which One Should You Buy in 2025?

  • Best for Most Buyers → Clean Factory (best balance of price & quality)
  • Best for Dial Perfection → BT Factory (Buff dials are insane)
  • Best for Collectors → Noob (if you can find old stock)

At XWatches.ws, we source directly from these top manufacturers to ensure you get the best super clone Daytona possible. Contact us for the latest 2025 models!

Would you like recommendations on specific Daytona versions (Panda, Gold, Oysterflex, etc.)?

Welcome to XWatches.ws – Your Premier Destination for High-End Replica Watches

At XWatches.ws, we specialize in providing top-tier super clone (replica) watches that mirror the craftsmanship and elegance of the world’s most prestigious timepieces. Based in Guangzhou, China—the heart of the replica watch industry—we have established strong, long-term relationships with the finest manufacturers, ensuring unmatched quality, precision, and attention to detail in every watch we offer.

Why Choose XWatches.ws?

✔ 1:1 Super Clone Quality – Our watches are meticulously crafted to replicate every detail of the originals, from the movement to the materials.
✔ Trusted Manufacturers – We work exclusively with the most reputable factories, guaranteeing stability, consistency, and reliability.
✔ Wide Selection – Explore an extensive collection of Rolex, Patek Philippe, Audemars Piguet, Omega, and more, all at a fraction of the retail price.
✔ Discreet & Secure Shipping – Your order is handled with confidentiality and delivered worldwide with reliable shipping methods.
✔ Exceptional Customer Service – Our team is dedicated to providing a seamless shopping experience, from selection to after-sales support.

Whether you’re a watch enthusiast or seeking a luxury timepiece without the exorbitant price tag, XWatches.ws is your ultimate source for high-end replica watches that impress.

Visit XWatches.ws today and discover perfection in every detail!

Luxury Redefined. Affordably Yours.

ARF vs. Clean Factory: Which Makes the Best Pepsi Replica?

When it comes to the Rolex GMT-Master II “Pepsi” (126710BLRO), ARF and Clean Factory are two of the top competitors. Both produce high-quality replicas, but they excel in different areas. Here’s a detailed breakdown:

1. Case & Bracelet

  • Clean Factory
    • Uses 904L steel (same as genuine).
    • Case shape and lugs are very close to authentic.
    • Brushing and polishing are extremely refined, nearly indistinguishable from gen.
    • Slightly better weight distribution (feels more solid).
  • ARF
    • Also uses 904L steel, but earlier versions had 316F (now mostly updated).
    • Bracelet is smoother (less sharp edges than Clean’s early batches).
    • Clasp action is slightly better (clicks more like gen).

Winner? Clean for overall case finish, ARF for bracelet comfort.

2. Bezel (The Biggest Debate)

  • Clean Factory
    • Ceramic bezel (latest version with “V3” or “V4” updates) – Colors are very close to gen (red is deeper, blue is less purple).
    • Slightly better transition between red and blue.
    • Numbers are platinum-filled, like genuine.
  • ARF
    • Older versions had “speed bump” issue (visible transition flaw at 6 & 18).
    • Latest ARF bezels improved, but still not as good as Clean’s.
    • Colors can look slightly off under certain lighting (blue may appear purplish).

Winner? Clean Factory—best bezel on the market right now.

3. Movement

  • Clean Factory
    • Uses DD3285 (latest clone movement) – True GMT function, 70+ hr power reserve.
    • More reliable than older SH/VR movements.
  • ARF
    • Traditionally used SH3186 (timebomb movement) – Not a true GMT, prone to breaking.
    • Some newer ARFs now use VR3186 (better but still not DD3285 level).

Winner? Clean Factory—superior movement with gen-like functionality.

4. Dial & Crystal

  • Clean Factory
    • Dial print is crisp, coronet shape is excellent.
    • Cyclops magnification is accurate (no distortion).
    • Lume is strong and matches gen color.
  • ARF
    • Text is slightly bolder (minor tell).
    • Cyclops can sometimes be misaligned.
    • Lume is good but not as bright as Clean’s.

Winner? Clean Factory—better attention to detail.

5. Price & Availability

  • Clean Factory
    • More expensive (~$500-$600).
    • Harder to find in stock (high demand).
  • ARF
    • Slightly cheaper (~$450-$550).
    • Easier to source (more dealers carry it).

Winner? ARF if budget is a concern, but Clean is worth the extra cost.

Final Verdict: Which One Should You Buy?

✅ Best Overall Replica? Clean Factory (better bezel, movement, and finishing).
✅ Better Bracelet Feel? ARF (smoother edges, better clasp).
✅ Closest to Gen? Clean, no contest (especially with the DD3285 movement).

If you want the absolute best Pepsi replica today, go with Clean.
If you prefer a slightly cheaper option with a comfier bracelet, ARF is still decent.

APW Factory’s AP 26331 – The Best Royal Oak Chrono Replica Yet?

The Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Chronograph 26331 has been replicated by several factories—B, OM, and IP—but none have perfected it. While I previously recommended OM’s version, their production delays and inconsistencies make them unreliable. Now, APW Factory has stepped in with a vastly improved 26331 replica, fixing many of the flaws found in earlier versions.

Why the AP 26331 Stands Out

Personally, I prefer the 26331 over the 26240—its asymmetrical subdials (different sizes) add more visual appeal compared to the uniform subdials on the 26240. Previous replicas had glaring issues:

  • B Factory’s version had misaligned subdials.
  • OM’s version had non-functional small hands at 3 and 9 o’clock.

APW’s 26331 fixes both flaws while also improving:
✔ Case thickness (11mm) and diameter (41mm) – Nearly identical to genuine.
✔ Correct subdial positioning – Sunburst finish matches the authentic watch.
✔ Laddered date window – A signature AP detail.
✔ Stable SL4801 movement – Reliable chronograph function.
✔ Superior chamfering – Sharp, refined edges on case and bracelet.

Room for Improvement

While APW’s 26331 is impressive, two minor flaws remain:

  1. Brushing on case sides – Could be more pronounced.
  2. Subdial-to-main-dial transition – Slightly rough upon close inspection.

Still, given its affordable price (lower than most 26240 replicas), this is the best 26331 option available today.

Final Verdict

If you love the Royal Oak Chrono 26331, APW’s version is the closest yet—far surpassing B and OM. While not 100% perfect, it’s the most balanced choice in terms of accuracy, functionality, and price.

Would you pick this over the 26240? Let me know your thoughts!

The Rise of High-End Richard Mille Replicas: A Market Overview

In the past two years, Rolex and Richard Mille (RM) have dominated the replica watch scene. While Rolex remains a timeless favorite, Richard Mille replicas have surged in popularity, with more factories now producing high-quality versions.

The Evolution of RM Replicas

Five years ago, KV Factory was one of the few makers of RM replicas, though their quality was mid-range by today’s standards. Later, ZF Factory entered the market with their RM35-02, which quickly became the best replica available at the time (I reviewed their V3 edition here). Since then, ZF has refined the RM35-02 further, raising its price but maintaining its status as the top choice.

Other factories like T+ and Sonic also tried competing, initially pricing their RMs high. However, they couldn’t match the quality of ZF and BBR, leading to price drops—and in T+’s case, disappearance.

Now, APS Factory has joined the race, shocking many with their recent RM055 release. Given APS and ZF’s long-standing collaboration, this move isn’t entirely surprising. But how does APS’s RM055 compare? It surpasses ZF’s version in several key areas.

APS vs. ZF: The RM055 Showdown

ZF previously offered the RM055 in white ceramic and NTPT, equipped with a super clone RMUL2 movement. APS currently only produces the NTPT version, but with notable upgrades:

  1. Movement Finishing
    • Both use the same super clone RMUL2 (V2), but APS applies a satin finish on the movement plates, making them look closer to genuine.
    • ZF’s movement plates appear too glossy from certain angles.
    • APS also improved a small detail on the movement’s left corner—visible in side-by-side comparisons.
  2. Case & Build Quality
    • The carbon fiber texture on APS’s case is more refined.
    • APS’s case is thinner than ZF’s.
    • The rubber strap is more comfortable than BBR’s.
    • The titanium clasp features removable screws, unlike ZF’s fixed ones.

Which RM Replica Should You Buy?

  • RM35-01 → BBR Factory
  • RM055 NTPT → APS Factory
  • RM35-02 → ZF Factory

APS’s RM055 is a major step forward, especially for those who prioritize movement accuracy and case finishing. For now, APS leads in the RM055 category, while ZF remains the king of the RM35-02.

Would you like a detailed side-by-side comparison between ZF and APS? Let me know in the comments!

Titanium Yacht-Master 42mm 226627 – A High-Quality Rolex Replica Review

Is this Rolex’s first titanium timepiece? It’s a highly sought-after watch, and many enthusiasts wonder if a top-tier replica exists. Initially, the EW factory produced this replica, but it was shut down months ago for reasons well-known in the community. Later, a new manufacturer named EWE emerged—could it be connected to EW? Perhaps a rebranded version or an entirely new operation. Before Clean entered the scene, most buyers opted for EWE’s titanium Yacht-Master replica. Another factory, TW+, also crafted this model, though there are multiple factories using the “TW” name (such as TWA, TW, and TW+). Their exact relationship is unclear, but they typically produce mid-range replicas rather than super clones.

EWE’s version features a Hangzhou 3235 movement, known for its reliability and impressive 72-hour power reserve. Meanwhile, TW+ equips its replica with a Shanghai 3235—though it’s uncertain if they’ve upgraded to a newer version. From my experience, the Hangzhou 3235 in EWE’s model performs well.

Clean Factory’s Titanium Yacht-Master 226627

Clean’s replica is entirely crafted from Grade 5 titanium, making its weight nearly identical to the genuine watch. With the protective plastic and sticker still on, the replica weighs 109.6 grams, just slightly more than the authentic 107.4 grams. Titanium has a subdued, matte appearance compared to stainless steel, and its hardness makes polishing challenging. However, Clean has done an excellent job. Upon close inspection, the brushed finish on the bracelet may appear slightly coarser, but this is barely noticeable from a normal viewing distance. Even the genuine model has a pronounced brushed texture, though with more uniform lines.

The clasp engravings are accurate, but I noticed a minor flaw: when closed, the left metal piece sits slightly higher than the right, unlike the perfectly aligned genuine version. It’s unclear whether this is a consistent issue or limited to my sample.

The case thickness measures 11.89mm, staying under 12mm for a sleek profile. Clean also includes ceramic tubes in the bracelet links, claiming this matches the genuine watch’s design. These tubes enhance durability, preventing scratches and ensuring the bracelet remains tight over time.

Inside, Clean uses an SH3235 movement, commonly found in their Datejust replicas. While Clean advertises a 72-hour power reserve, real-world performance may differ. Still, this movement is widely used and considered stable.

The black ceramic bezel has a matte finish, contrasting with the polished markers. The genuine bezel has a more pronounced matte texture, while Clean’s version appears slightly more refined.

Final Thoughts

Clean’s replica surpasses EWE’s in overall finishing, but it also comes at a higher price point. Whether you choose Clean or EWE, both offer solid options for this sought-after titanium Rolex.

Top 10 Best-Selling Super Clone Watches of 2024

2024 has been a groundbreaking year for both watchmakers and enthusiasts, with cutting-edge replica technology pushing the limits of precision. While Clean Factory continues to dominate the Rolex segment, VS and APS have made significant strides, delivering unmatched quality and innovation. Here are the 10 hottest super clones that ruled the market this year:

1. Clean Factory GMT-Master II “Pepsi” (V3)

The latest V3 upgrade focuses on the ceramic bezel, now claimed to be the closest to genuine. While some still prefer the V2’s color tone, the V3 remains a top seller among collectors. For the best super clone GMT, Clean Factory is still the go-to choice.

2. VS Factory Daytona 126500 (Dandong 4131 Movement)

With its super clone Dandong 4131 movement, VS’s Daytona outperforms Clean’s Shanghai 4131 in accuracy. After refining the hand finish, sales skyrocketed. Though Clean offers more variations, VS wins in movement precision—making it a favorite among purists.

3. Clean Factory Daytona 116518 (Yellow Gold & Ceramic)

This black & gold Daytona (ceramic bezel + rubber strap) is one of Clean’s best-sellers. While VS challenges Clean in Daytonas, Clean’s attention to detail keeps it ahead. Every Clean Daytona could make this list—they’re that good.

4. Day-Date “Heavy Version” (GM vs. THB)

The weighted Day-Date trend exploded in 2024, with multiple factories (GM, QF, K, CBD, THB) competing. GM offers the best price, while THB uses a super clone 3255 movement for superior finishing. If you want heft + quality, these two lead the pack.

5. PP Factory Nautilus 5712 (V3 with Clone 240 Movement)

The 5712 V3 (with updated clasp & movement) is a market favorite. Many dealers now offer SW dial & hand upgrades, just like the 3K 5711 mod trend. A must-have for Patek fans.

6. VS Factory Datejust 41 (Grey Dial, Jubilee Bracelet)

Both VS & Clean make excellent Datejusts, but VS’s version has become the modder’s choice. Enthusiasts upgrade it with genuine bezels, dials, and hands—an affordable way to achieve near-gen perfection.

7. APS Factory RM055 (Ultra-Light Carbon Fiber Masterpiece)

Richard Mille replicas surged in popularity, and APS’s RM055 leads the charge. With improved case materials & movement stability, it’s the top-selling RM replica today.

8. APS Factory AP 15407 (Openworked Royal Oak)

Among APS’s AP lineup (15400, 15500, 15720), the 15407 stole the spotlight in 2024. The upgraded balance wheel impressed, though some seek double-balance mods (expensive but stunning).

9. QF Factory Daytona “Le Mans” (Regular vs. Heavy Weight)

QF’s Le Mans Daytona comes in standard & weighted versions (the latter uses extra links—not recommended). Clean Factory is set to release its own Le Mans soon, which could shake up the rankings.

10. 3K Factory Nautilus 5711 (Modder’s Dream Watch)

Though ranked #10, the 3K 5711 deserves higher praise. With SW dial & hand upgrades, it’s a modding favorite, blending affordability with customization potential.

Honorable Mentions:

  • VS/Clean Submariners (Still unbeatable)
  • APS Royal Oak 15500/15720 (Close contenders)
  • BT/DD Daytonas (Fading but still relevant)

Final Thoughts:

The battle between Clean & VS continues, while APS dominates AP & RM replicas. Whether you prioritize movement accuracy (VS), finishing (Clean), or innovation (APS), 2024’s lineup offers something for every collector.

Who Dominates the Super Clone Rolex Daytona Market? Clean Factory Takes the Lead

When it comes to the best super clone Rolex Daytona, Clean Factory remains the undisputed leader. Earlier this year, during the Chinese New Year holiday, Clean made a strategic move by upgrading their 12xxxx series Daytona models with the Dandong 4131 movement—a decision that went largely unnoticed at the time. Now, all Clean 126500 Daytonas come equipped with this high-performance movement, the same one used by VS Factory. Even their newly released Daytonas will feature this upgrade.

Initially, when the Dandong 4131 was first introduced, many believed VS Factory would emerge as a strong competitor against Clean, especially since VS developed this movement. However, the tables have turned—Clean’s adoption of the Dandong 4131 has effectively eliminated VS’s only major advantage. Since its release, watch enthusiasts have shown strong preference for VS Factory’s Daytonas, particularly their 12xxxx series models, which gained more popularity than Clean’s versions. This shift likely pressured Clean into upgrading their movement to stay ahead.

For VS Factory, this was a missed opportunity to surpass Clean in the Daytona market—a chance that doesn’t come often. Years ago, a similar strategic advantage propelled Clean Factory to its current dominance.

Price vs. Quality: Why Clean Still Wins

Some argue that VS Factory offers better pricing, even including an extra rubber strap with each Daytona. However, serious collectors seeking top-tier super clones prioritize quality over cost. Most are willing to pay 50–50–100 more for a superior product, and Clean delivers precisely that.

The Decline of Other Competitors (BT & ZF)

The competition has thinned out—BT Factory has practically vanished from discussions, and ZF Factory hasn’t made significant strides in Daytona replication. As of now, Clean Factory stands alone at the top.

Clean’s Latest Daytona: A Closer Look

Before showcasing the new Daytona images, let’s examine the movement upgrade:

  • Left: The older Shanghai 4131 (previously used by Clean)
  • Right: The new Dandong 4131 (now used by both Clean & VS)

The difference is clear—Dandong’s movement offers superior precision and reliability.

Key Features of Clean’s Daytona:

✅ Bezel Engravings – The “UNITS PER HOUR” engraving is near-genuine in thickness and shape. Both Clean and VS excel here, but Clean’s overall craftsmanship remains superior.

✅ Hands & Hour Markers – Flawless polishing on the hour and minute hands, with zero burrs. Each hour marker is smooth-edged and perfectly finished.

✅ Rehaut & Serial Number – The inner bezel features a unique serial number, adding to authenticity.

✅ Dial & Sunburst Finish – Clean’s dial finishing is unmatched, especially in the sunburst effect on both the main and sub-dials.

✅ Clasp & Buckle Details –

  • New clasp design for rubber-strap models, featuring Au750 engraving on gold versions.
  • Improved extension system for better adjustability.
  • Stainless steel models retain the older clasp.
  • The buckle ships separately in a plastic bag (uninstalled).

Final Verdict: Clean Factory is the Best Choice

For enthusiasts seeking the most accurate super clone Daytona, Clean Factory remains the top recommendation. Their attention to detail, movement upgrade, and superior finishing solidify their lead in the market.

Below are the latest images of Clean’s new Daytona lineup, showcasing their exceptional craftsmanship:

(Insert images here: Gold Daytona Collection, Two-Tone models, White Dial variations, Bezel engravings, Movement comparison, Lume shots, etc.)

The Latest in High-End Replicas: VS Factory’s Weighted Daytona and Upcoming Omega

The replica watch market has seen an influx of impressive new releases lately, with VS Factory leading the charge. Their latest offerings – particularly the weighted Rolex Daytona 126519 V2 and the upcoming Omega Seamaster “No Time to Die” V4 – are making waves among enthusiasts.

VS Factory’s Growing Dominance

VS has been stepping up its game, directly challenging Clean Factory’s stronghold on the Rolex Daytona market. Their weighted Daytona replica is a serious contender, boasting improved heft and finishing. Meanwhile, the soon-to-be-released Omega Seamaster “No Time to Die” V4 will feature VS’s new super clone 8800 movement – a major milestone for Omega replica fans.

While prices for these super clones continue to rise, the refinements in craftsmanship and movement accuracy justify the premium for many collectors.

The Weighted Replica Wars: Who Does It Best?

VS isn’t the only factory pushing boundaries with weighted replicas. Several manufacturers are competing to produce the heaviest, most gen-like watches:

  • GM Factory – Pioneered the weighted trend by adding metal plates over the movement in their Day-Date models. While durable, their finishing lags behind newer competitors.
  • QF & THB – Use longer bracelets to increase weight, but at inflated prices (THB’s Day-Date costs more than a Clean/VS Daytona!).
  • CBD & Others – Some factories experiment with tungsten-copper alloy cases, but this risks peeling or corrosion over time.

VS’s approach with their weighted Daytona avoids these pitfalls by focusing on balance and wearability rather than just brute weight.

VS Daytona 126519 V2 vs. Genuine: How Close Is It?

Let’s break down the key differences:

1. Weight Comparison

  • Case Weight:
    • VS Replica: 96.2g
    • Genuine: 99.3g (a negligible 3g difference)
  • Bracelet/Clasp Weight:
    • VS Rubber Strap + Clasp: 40.5g
    • Genuine: 64.2g (due to heavier clasp construction)

VS could have added internal weights to match the gen’s heft, but this would compromise comfort. Instead, they prioritized a natural wearing experience.

2. Finishing Details

  • Lug Engravings: Genuine watches have cleaner, more refined markings.
  • Dial Sunburst: The gen’s dial exhibits a more pronounced sunburst effect.

Still, at a glance, the VS Daytona is uncannily close to the real deal.

Final Verdict: Is the VS Daytona Worth It?

✅ Yes, if you want:

  • A well-balanced, comfortable weighted Daytona
  • Strong movement reliability (VS’s clone 4130 is proven)
  • Solid value compared to overpriced competitors

❌ No, if you demand:

  • Exact gen weight (the clasp is lighter)
  • Flawless engravings (minor differences on lugs)

For Omega fans, keep an eye out for the Seamaster “No Time to Die” V4 – it could be a game-changer.

Would you pick the VS Daytona, or are you holding out for another factory’s release?