Is this Rolex’s first titanium timepiece? It’s a highly sought-after watch, and many enthusiasts wonder if a top-tier replica exists. Initially, the EW factory produced this replica, but it was shut down months ago for reasons well-known in the community. Later, a new manufacturer named EWE emerged—could it be connected to EW? Perhaps a rebranded version or an entirely new operation. Before Clean entered the scene, most buyers opted for EWE’s titanium Yacht-Master replica. Another factory, TW+, also crafted this model, though there are multiple factories using the “TW” name (such as TWA, TW, and TW+). Their exact relationship is unclear, but they typically produce mid-range replicas rather than super clones.
EWE’s version features a Hangzhou 3235 movement, known for its reliability and impressive 72-hour power reserve. Meanwhile, TW+ equips its replica with a Shanghai 3235—though it’s uncertain if they’ve upgraded to a newer version. From my experience, the Hangzhou 3235 in EWE’s model performs well.
Clean Factory’s Titanium Yacht-Master 226627
Clean’s replica is entirely crafted from Grade 5 titanium, making its weight nearly identical to the genuine watch. With the protective plastic and sticker still on, the replica weighs 109.6 grams, just slightly more than the authentic 107.4 grams. Titanium has a subdued, matte appearance compared to stainless steel, and its hardness makes polishing challenging. However, Clean has done an excellent job. Upon close inspection, the brushed finish on the bracelet may appear slightly coarser, but this is barely noticeable from a normal viewing distance. Even the genuine model has a pronounced brushed texture, though with more uniform lines.
The clasp engravings are accurate, but I noticed a minor flaw: when closed, the left metal piece sits slightly higher than the right, unlike the perfectly aligned genuine version. It’s unclear whether this is a consistent issue or limited to my sample.
The case thickness measures 11.89mm, staying under 12mm for a sleek profile. Clean also includes ceramic tubes in the bracelet links, claiming this matches the genuine watch’s design. These tubes enhance durability, preventing scratches and ensuring the bracelet remains tight over time.
Inside, Clean uses an SH3235 movement, commonly found in their Datejust replicas. While Clean advertises a 72-hour power reserve, real-world performance may differ. Still, this movement is widely used and considered stable.
The black ceramic bezel has a matte finish, contrasting with the polished markers. The genuine bezel has a more pronounced matte texture, while Clean’s version appears slightly more refined.
Final Thoughts
Clean’s replica surpasses EWE’s in overall finishing, but it also comes at a higher price point. Whether you choose Clean or EWE, both offer solid options for this sought-after titanium Rolex.
